|
|
Post by Tobbok Nassias on Jan 9, 2006 0:57:54 GMT -5
Thanks Ani-Chay Pinn, you said what I really wanted to say. The truth is, if it can't be reasonably and repeatedly tested...it isn't science, and no one with any real science back ground is going to treat it as such unless the philosophers can give us some related...otherwise unexplainable (but measurable)... phenominon associated. Basicaly it is the same reason why Scientists can't use science as a way to say that "God does exist," if you can't put it in a bottle and study it...you can't prove or disprove it's existance. I'm afraid zero point fields are just beyond the scope of real science. I will say, as earlier, the best hope we have for anything even remotely related is within the realm of quantum physics, but even there we are just now "cutting our teeth," or so to speak.
|
|